How to Analyse a SERP and Beat Your Competitors
You search for a keyword you want to rank for, scroll through the results, and feel vaguely defeated. The top results look authoritative. Some have been there for years. You're not sure what you're looking at or what it would actually take to crack that page.
That feeling isn't a signal to give up. It's a signal you haven't analysed the SERP properly yet.
A SERP analysis turns that vague intimidation into a concrete list of things you can do. Here's how to do it right.
What You're Actually Looking For
When you analyse a SERP, you're trying to answer four questions:
- Who is ranking? Are they big brands, niche sites, or a mix?
- Why are they ranking? What type of content won this position?
- What are they missing? Where are the gaps you can exploit?
- Can you realistically compete? Is this worth your effort right now?
That's the whole job. Everything below is how you answer those questions systematically.
Step 1: Read the SERP Layout First
Before you click a single result, read the SERP itself. Google's layout tells you a lot about search intent before you've seen one word of the ranking content.
Look for:
- Featured snippets — Google has already decided one result is the best direct answer. You need to either beat that result or target a different format.
- People Also Ask boxes — These show you adjacent questions that are part of this topic. They're content ideas handed to you for free.
- Local pack results — If a map pack appears, this keyword has local intent. A blog post probably won't rank here.
- Shopping results — Transactional intent. Content pages will struggle.
- Video carousels — Google thinks some users want to watch, not read. That's a content format signal.
- Sitelinks under one result — That domain dominates the topic. Outranking them will be hard.
If the SERP is clean — just ten blue links — you're looking at a more neutral keyword where well-structured content can compete on its own merit.
Step 2: Categorise the Top 10 Results
Open a spreadsheet. For each of the top 10 results, record:
| Column | What to note |
|---|---|
| Position | 1–10 |
| Domain | The root domain |
| Page type | Blog post, product page, category page, tool, forum thread |
| Domain Authority (DA) | Pull this from Moz or Ahrefs |
| Word count | Rough estimate from a browser extension or copy-paste |
| Backlinks to the page | From any link tool |
| Freshness | When was it last updated? |
You don't need perfect data. You need directional data.
Now look at the pattern. If positions 1–8 are all Reddit threads and Quora answers, Google is surfacing community opinion, not editorial content — and that's useful to know. If they're all long-form guides from established publications, the bar is higher but the path is clearer.
For a deeper look at what each column is actually telling you, SERP Metrics Explained: What to Track and What to Ignore walks through exactly which numbers matter and which ones to stop worrying about.
Step 3: Analyse the Content Itself
Click through to the top three results and read them properly. You're not looking to copy them. You're looking for what they failed to do.
Ask yourself:
- Does this actually answer the question well? A lot of top-ranking content is dated, thin, or vague. It ranks because it got there early, not because it's good.
- What subtopics did they cover? Make a list.
- What subtopics did they skip? This is your opportunity list.
- What format did they use? Steps, tables, examples, comparisons?
- Is there a better angle? More specific, more current, more practical?
The gap between what the user actually wants and what the current results deliver is where you win. If three of the top five results are surface-level explainers and someone hasn't yet written a practical, step-by-step version — that's your opening.
This kind of content gap analysis is also how you identify opportunities across a whole keyword set, not just one query. How to Analyze SERP Results to Find Content Opportunities covers that broader process.
Step 4: Understand Who You're Actually Competing With
Not every result is a true competitor. A Reddit thread ranking in position 4 is not the same obstacle as a purpose-built article from a domain with 60 DA and 800 backlinks.
When you look at your competitor list, separate them:
- Structural competitors — Sites with similar domain authority to yours, covering similar topics. These are beatable.
- Authority competitors — Wikipedia, major publications, category-defining brands. Outranking them for head terms takes time. But you can often outrank them for long-tail variations.
- Accidental competitors — Forum threads, aggregator pages, news articles. These often have weak topical relevance. A focused piece beats them.
Understanding the difference tells you where to direct energy. For a full breakdown of how to map who's actually in your space and how they're positioned, see How to Analyze SERP Competitors and Close the Gap.
Step 5: Assess Your Realistic Shot
Now you have the data. Here's how to decide whether to pursue this keyword:
Green light if:
- Multiple results are thin, dated, or poorly structured
- Domain authorities in the top 5 are close to yours
- The intent matches a content format you can produce well
- You already have some topical authority in this area
Caution if:
- Positions 1–5 are all dominated by one or two major brands with thousands of referring domains
- The top results are genuinely excellent and recent
- Your domain has no existing content in this space
Don't ignore a hard keyword entirely just because you can't rank now. Flag it. Build topical authority around easier adjacent terms first, then return to it.
Step 6: Decide What to Build
Based on your SERP analysis, you now know:
- What content format to use (guide, list, comparison, tool landing page)
- How long it needs to be to be competitive
- What subtopics you must cover
- What angle gives you an edge over what's already ranking
- Whether you need links, or whether well-structured content can do it alone
Write a brief. Give your content a specific angle — not just "a better article about X" but "a step-by-step guide that covers Y and Z, which the current results all skip, aimed at someone who already knows the basics."
That specificity is what actually beats the incumbents.
Doing This at Scale
Analysing one SERP manually takes 20–30 minutes when done properly. If you have a site with dozens of content opportunities — which most sites with any domain authority do — the bottleneck becomes finding all the gaps, not just analysing individual ones.
Tools like Ahrefs and Semrush can surface keyword gaps when you run a competitor comparison. Rankfill is another option: it maps every keyword your competitors are capturing that your site is missing, scores those competitors, and estimates the traffic potential, which gets you from raw SERP data to a prioritised content plan faster.
For individual keywords you've already identified, the manual process above is the right approach. For mapping a whole space systematically, some form of tooling is worth using.
FAQ
How long does it take to properly analyse a SERP? Done well, 20–30 minutes per keyword. That includes reading the layout, categorising the top 10, reviewing the top 3 results for content gaps, and assessing your competitive position.
Do I need paid tools to analyse a SERP? No, but they help. You can get domain authority data from MozBar (free), check page word counts manually, and read the actual results for free. Paid tools speed up the backlink and keyword data.
What if the top results are all big brands? Look for long-tail variations of the keyword where the competition is thinner. Establish topical authority through those first. Alternatively, find the specific subtopic or angle the big brands have ignored — they often cover topics broadly rather than deeply.
How do I know what content format to use? Let the SERP tell you. If the top results are all listicles, Google favours that format for this intent. If they're step-by-step guides, match that. Producing a different format than what's ranking is a gamble you usually lose.
Can I rank without backlinks? For low-competition keywords, yes — especially if your domain has existing authority. For competitive terms, backlinks still matter. Focus on content gap and quality first; links are easier to earn when the content is genuinely better than what's ranking.
What's the difference between a SERP analysis and a keyword gap analysis? A SERP analysis looks at one query in depth — who's ranking, what they built, and where the gaps are. A keyword gap analysis looks across your whole site versus competitors to find queries they rank for that you don't. Both inform each other. See SERP Keywords: How to Find What's Ranking on Page One for how to pull the keyword data that feeds into both.